Our Products:
Angle Viewfinder VIDEOS



Flipbac G4 Grip on the Canon Eos
July 04, 2014, 11:20 am
UPDATE - Top 5
July 03, 2013, 12:18 am
Sigma DP2 Merrill with the Flipbac G4 Grip.
March 25, 2013, 7:02 pm
EnglishFrançaisрусскийEspañol日本語DeutschPortuguês中文(繁體)中文(簡體)한국어
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Starry, starry night.



Butterflies belong to the order Lepidoptera. This name means “scale-wing” in Latin and refers to the scale cell structures found on butterfly wings. I had read about butterfly scales and thought about trying to photograph this beautiful feature of their design.

My opportunity came when I noticed the wing of a fallen butterfly
on the street side and brought it home.  By window light I photographed the piece of wing laying on a  piece of black paper with my compact digital camera.


When I look I look at this picture, it feels as though I am gazing at the stars of the midnight sky.


The abilities of common compact digital cameras
constantly amaze me. This shot was easily taken without any special equipment. I first took several shots then removed the memory card to review the images on my home computer. After a couple tries I found what I was looking for.

I am not sure if this is technically called macro photography or close-up photography, but either way, the macro feature on most of today's compact digital cameras gives the casual photographer access to a miniature world that was previously not accessible.

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 2View comments
Sunday, April 19, 2009
Death by a thousand cuts.
I started this blog stating that I wanted to talk more about photography than gear. For some flawed reason I didn’t want to be viewed as a gear head. But I confess, I like cameras equally as much as I like photography.So that brings me back to this blog entry.




Picture credit: http://www.hasselblad.com/

You may have noticed that most of my posts in some way look back into photographic history. This is likely because that’s where the idea of the Flipbac was born - medium format cameras, the likes of Hasselblad, Rollei, Contax, etc.  All very romantic.

But here’s a change of tack. What happened to these fine European cameras? Where are they today?

Not one dominant European digital camera comes to mind? It appears these leading companies were blind to the digital change. What really surprises me is that there was plenty of warning and this change did not happen quickly. As far as I can see, it was poor poor leadership. Why did this lack of vision affect almost all of the European photo industry?

I’m not sure I know the answer as there are likely many reasons but I found this interesting link on DP Review:

http://www.slideshare.net/... ...-the-moon-to-surviving-disruptive-innovation

Pentax, Nikon, Canon, Olympus, etc, all made film cameras, yet they adapted and became leaders.

What kind of car are you driving? This situation appears strikingly similar to the American car industry. Death by a thousand cuts? A terrible way to die, even more terrible when it is self-inflicted.

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 1View comments
Tuesday, April 07, 2009
Nikon entry-level DSLR with articulating display?
Or is he using a Flipbac? I guess we will have to wait until April 14th to find out for sure. You can read the full article here: engadget.com




Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 0View comments
Saturday, March 28, 2009
Some inspiration.
This article is about a year old but has some good street photography images. The Beauty of Street Photography.


Photo by Matt Stuart

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 0View comments
Monday, March 23, 2009
Your turn.
The commenting feature is now working properly. Sort of. You need to type in your name and email when commenting, but don't worry, these will not be published. The comment will be anonymous. If you want a name to appear you have to write the name into your message.

If you have a question or comment that is not related, please contact me via email.

The views presented in individual comments are those of the party or parties who left the comment and may not represent the views of Flipbac Innovations. Guest comments may be unpublished at any time and for any reason.


Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 0View comments
Monday, March 02, 2009
Capture the essence.
As our skills and understanding increase, we often chase a never ending goal. We long for our images to reproduce reality. Higher and higher pixel counts, broader dynamic range, higher resolving, faster lenses, etc.

When talent, and state of the art equipment come together the results are truly impressive.
However, reality is subjective. Often our mind remembers a moment different than the lens. So, are there other ways to use your camera to capture a scene?


On a recent visit to Cottesloe Beach in Perth, Western Australia, it was a hot, sunny, windy day. The sand was too hot to walk on and the reflection off the sand and water was blinding. Sun light pierced deep into the pristine water creating beautiful shades of aquamarine. As beautiful as it was, it is a difficult scene to capture in a way that expressed the moment. The dynamic range from light to shadow was too broad for most cameras. What to do?



This image is over exposed 2 or 3 stops. All detail in the sand is burnt out. The walking figures appear mirage like. You can imagine the wind blown sand hitting  your legs and voices faintly heard through the thunder of the surf.

Over exposure. It is simple and easy to do. Set your camera to manual and purposely over expose some images. Walking through a forest, reflections off a car, a back lit portrait etc. Try over exposure and it may prove the best means to capture the essence of a moment.

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 0View comments
Sunday, February 01, 2009
Shoot on the dark side.

Photo by Annie Leibovitz, courtesy Contact Press | NB Pictures

We are naturally drawn to light. Often when taking portraits we first shoot with the light side of the subject closest to the camera. An approach that often yields good results is to shoot with the dark side of the subject closest to the camera. We see this technique in a recent portrait of the queen by Annie Leibovitz.

Experiment by letting the highlights overexpose. Expose for the shadows and the light will often “wrap around” the subject.

The question we now ask: Does Darth Vader shoot Nikon or Canon?


Posted byFlipbac | Send comments to: comments@flipbac.com
Comments: 1View comments
Friday, January 16, 2009
Only for professionals?
I have a friend who loves camera gear. He has a recent DSLR and several professional series fast zoom lenses. All quiet beautiful, big, impressive and expensive. I asked him if he had ever thought of using a 50mm prime lens.

“My skill isn’t high enough to handle a prime 50mm lens. They are only for professionals,” he replied. “That’s why I have three zoom lenses, much easier to handle.”

As a youth I was introduced to photography by my uncle who had (if my memory serves me right) a Nikon SLR and 3 prime lenses - 28mm, 50mm, and a 120mm. They served him well for many years. I ended up being a Canon guy, as it was a Canon AE1 that I inherited from my dad that he seldom used. It came with the standard issue 50mm 1.8. As a youth, with little money to buy more lenses (let alone film and processing), I shot only with the 50mm, only dreaming of owning a “big zoom” one day.


                                           

After a few years I bought my first zoom, a 4.5-5.6 70-200mm Canon zoom lens. I proudly hung my big new gun over my shoulder, often clipping on a large black lens shade to enhance its prowess. But to my dismay I was dogged by the slowness of the lens. With my 50mm I was hand holding down to 1/15 of a second and getting great shots. I missed the shallow depth of field and the small size. The zoom lens was big and heavy, pictures were often blurry and under exposed. People ran for cover when I pulled it out. On the outside, I loved the manliness and respect that came with the big black zoom. Not to say it wasn’t great for a bright day outside. But on the inside, I was frustrated with its trade-offs.

After college I started assisting local professional photographers part-time. Two in particular - one a commercial photographer, his forte was corporate and editorial portraits. The other, a talented wedding photographer who fell in love with every wedding she went to. They both had a lot of gear - medium and 35 mm format - but between the two of them, not one zoom lens.

So what’s my point? I guess my point is you don’t need $1500 zoom lenses to take good pictures. And second, a cheap zoom lens will help you take worse pictures.

A fixed prime lens, such as a 50mm 1.8 or a 28mm 2.8, will actually give you more freedom not less. Slow shutter speeds, shallow depths of fields, fast focusing, small in size, light in weight, bright viewfinder, and sharp, sharp images. If you want to zoom just step forward, step back.


Recent lens technology has made zoom lenses lighter, smaller, cheaper and in most cases better than zooms of the past. Image stabilization has greatly lowered acceptable hand holding shutter speeds. But image stabilization also helps prime lenses, taking us to recently unheard handholding shutter speeds – 1/15, 1/8, even ¼ of a second! If you love photography try and pick up a 50mm, 35mm, or 28mm prime lens. You will love the freedom, size, and image quality it will give you.

Something has gone awry when the consensus thinks only masters can handle a prime lens. Quite the opposite!

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 1View comments
Saturday, December 20, 2008
Winston Churchill By Yousef Karsh


This photo, taken almost 90 years ago, remains one of the most famous portraits ever taken. The story goes that Karsh wanted Churchill to remove his cigar from his mouth but Churchill did not want to. Reaching forward to appear as if he was going to adjust Churchill's collar, Karsh suddenly pulled the cigar from Churchill's mouth and snapped the picture. Cheeky fellow, that Karsh, considering WW2 was raging and Churchill was leader of the then world power, Great Britain. But the end result is truly a mesmerizing portrait.

Here's a question. From what angle did Karsh take the photo? Yes, from waist level. From where does an archer shoot his arrow? Eye level. From where does a deer hunter fire his rifle? Eye level. No wonder Clint Eastwood shot from the hip. Nobody saw it coming. They could not look away from those steely blue eyes! When the photographer holds a camera up to his face and points it at another person something happens, and in most cases it is not good. It often makes the subject uneasy. Maybe after some time he will relax, and overcome this intimidating lens pointing at him. Maybe not.

When you shoot from waist level, you can look face-to-face with your subject. There is no camera in the way. You can briefly look down to frame your subject then look up and carry on your conversation and fire away at just the right moment. Not to say there are not many amazing portraits taken from eye level, but shooting from the hip will in most cases be less intimidating for your subject.

Flipbac and relax. (Cheesy, I know, but it I could not resist).

Send comments to: comments@flipbac.com

Posted byFlipbac
Comments: 0View comments
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Have your say.
Until we get the add comment / view comments options sorted out please send your comments to: comments@flipbac.com

Let us know if you would like it to be posted.
Archives
September 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
July 2009
November 2009
March 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
February 2011
April 2011
June 2011
August 2011
September 2011
November 2011
March 2012
June 2012
October 2012
November 2012
March 2013
July 2013
July 2014
FLIPBAC INNOVATIONS © 2008-2013 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PATENTS PENDING.
Policies >>